ad 1 – Well, it’s not an official playbook of sorts

Now, it would be both nice and a bit boring if we had a well-known, well-understood and widely applied set of rules, standard operating procedures etc. for Enterprise 2.0 consulting. But I suspect that so far the best we’ve got are self-written and maintained “playbooks”. Isn’t a bad thing to have (I keep mine in a wiki of course). So, while the field of Enterprise 2.0 consulting is still evolving we’re all a bit like football coaches standing on the sidelines and improvising. This mustn’t be bad as long as you’re able to play the regular stuff as well (be it plain implementation stuff, understanding of organizational chnage management intricacies, boring project management etc.).

Both is needed to overcome these “organizational lines of defense (and counterattack)”

ad 2-4 hmm, thanks for the pointer to tribal leadership, I will check it out.

Now I wasn’t critical with the dachis connections stuff so far. The way I see it’s always more about providing the means for easy and ad-hoc networking (you know I am always touting the three principles of adaptivity, emergence and **connectivity**). All fitting nice with the ecosystem and hivemind ideas. Speaking of the latter I am very fond of this idea too, both because of the storing mechanisms and of the signalling (and information propagation) capabilities it has (another intra-model link, both to dynamic signals and the S in McAfee’s SLATES).

ad 5. oh yeah, on Twitter I would say #yesyesyes

Cheers,
Martin _ frogpond